I can give you one obvious example, from my perspective, in terms of duplication. I'll use British Columbia as an example, although Ontario is in the same boat, and I think most other provinces are going the same route.
When there is an incident involving a police officer on the street, there will typically be at least two, usually three, investigations conducted. At least in British Columbia, for example, there are two independent agencies that investigate police conduct issues. They'll conduct their own separate investigations, and usually the agency might have another investigation that they undertake as a result of the incident.
I think it's important to have independent oversight of police. That's critical, and we support that, but do you need to have three separate agencies, with three separate infrastructures and three separate sets of investigators conducting that same investigation into that one incident? Can you do it in a different way that's independent, that's objective, that's accountable, but that's also a bit more efficient?