With the greatest respect, sir, in my presentation I included at least a couple of examples of recommendations we made at the federal level around changes that could be easily made and that would realize significant efficiencies and reduce costs.
I think, though, that we need to have the conversation in some context. When it comes to the kinds of police officers you want to recruit, you can't add layers of accountability and increase scrutiny and increase expectations with respect to training and impose more training on police officers, and then expect there's not going to be a cost associated with that.
We are making presentations on a regular basis. I would argue that we're at the front of the discussion around where to find better ways of doing things and how to use technology better to find those savings. However, as I said in my submission, when—depending on who you talk to—80% to 90% of the costs are associated with people and you start to look at finding savings, unless you want to reduce the size of your workforce, it's a challenge.
We're part of that discussion. We are not just engaging in discussion; we're providing real examples of things that could be done to find those savings so that we can use tax dollars as efficiently as we can.