I think the approach on that, and it touched a little bit on your prior question, really is, again, moving away from commodities, whether it's drugs, counterfeit goods, or intellectual property type issues. It is really taking a broader view of the actual threat. What is that threat? What is that threat engaged in? By looking at that aspect instead of a much narrower view, that's where we're going to have greater effectiveness. Those have been some of the challenges in the past. Without having that opportunity of looking more horizontally, we've missed opportunities and probably haven't been as effective as we could have been. I think that's more the approach.
If I could add onto your prior question, I really think of this as a golden opportunity for an all-hands-on-deck approach to look at the problem and embrace academia in that dialogue about where law enforcement is most effective, what type of impact we're having in reducing the harm, and determining where the role of the different agencies is in that, because it is a whole of government approach at this point in time.