It's true. We have. The genesis of the question has really been more so about that expertise.
One of the things we've looked at going forward.... Also, just as a side comment, with this, we've had the benefit of really looking at doing things differently. I'll get to your question, but instead of taking a 20% hit, say, and cutting off a limb, we've had the opportunity to really look at how we can do things differently.
In terms of human resources, it's actually looking at changing our structures and our models to really look at creating communities of practice. Really, it's about communities of practice around the realm of knowledge management, where you have people providing the opportunity, whether it's related to financial crime, national security, serious and organized crime, international policing, or intelligence, but enabling an environment for them to really engage and be creative, right? It's something that's going to be critical for us in moving forward: identifying innovative ways of actually penetrating criminality.
This is something new, and I think it's much better than we've had in the past. We've been too siloed, so that innovation and creativity have been limited to a certain area. This is what is actually going to change to create that type of system. The measurements absolutely are questionable, but this is something that we're going to monitor for the next period of time.