I'll let the assistant commissioner follow.
I'll just make a couple of comments. In my briefings with the RCMP, they've advised me very clearly that they have the resources to administer the witness protection program. In fact, what this program really does is streamline the process, and it should, in many ways perhaps, even save some administrative costs in that respect. The prohibitions are simply a broader way of protecting individuals in law without requiring any additional resources. But if there are additional resources that are needed to administer the program, the RCMP advises me that they have the capacity to manage within the existing budget.
I want to make clear that when we talk about 107 witnesses who have been considered by the program in any one year, it's not that there are 107 who want to join the program; it's simply a consideration based on the criterion that it might be advisable for these individuals to be in the witness protection program. As indicated, there are some substantive limitations on their lifestyle and where they live, so many people simply do not want to take that route. There are other ways of protecting these individuals.
Perhaps the assistant commissioner can add to my comments.