Typically, and particularly when you're dealing with organized criminal activity, the types of informants that we'd be handling and who would be part of a program like this are obviously people with a significant amount of information. That information, when used successfully to prosecute, can disrupt the activity of organized crime groups, who obviously have a very significant incentive to prevent that from happening.
In today's world, with technology and with everybody possessing some kind of a smartphone, it becomes much easier for information to become available—with Facebook, with Twitter, and with other kinds of activities like that. Just one example is that you have a member who's essentially living a dual life, managing a high-needs informant, having to maintain separate residences, and protecting his or her family.
I just think that expanding the kinds of information that is protected, beyond the change of location or a name, provides that added level of security for our members. Although I don't profess to be an expert in this area, I know from talking with members who are actively involved in this activity that they're quite relieved, actually, to have legislation that better protects them from being dragged into a big mess because of activities they're engaged in order to protect the public.