I would welcome a group coming to the folks who lead our initiative in Saskatchewan. We'd have open arms to them. If we can share anything to help, that's what it's all about, first and foremost. With communities such as these, it's important that we give the ability to act locally. There are lots of lessons learned that we could provide in this particular area.
One thing I touched on that I haven't mentioned today when talking about the franchise model is that a COR, if you use that acronym for a centre of responsibility, is technically a master franchise. It was designed to support up to six hubs. In areas such as you have, very similar to Prince Albert, if you don't address the feeder systems in those particular areas with a similar type of process whereby you're actually on the ground and delivering results, nothing will matter, because the feeder system will just overwhelm you.
One master franchise supports six hubs; it's all connected together. Nothing is lost in translation: it's the same people—the same individuals, the same families—who need help. What you're in essence doing with intervention/prevention is asking them what you can do to help.
The way the justice system in essence is designed today, for the majority of stuff, is that we wait until people are in the system and we tell them how to fix them. The reality is that 95% of it is predictable. So if it's predictable, why aren't we asking them what we can do to help, spending a dollar wisely and getting them the help at the right time, which is more cost-effective and more efficient and gives them a better chance to succeed?
Doing that while maintaining this other group, for which we need to have a similar model, is not so helpful. Obviously they have to be responsible for the justice system.
Those are some of the things I would offer comments on.