We currently have the university studying that right now, and we will have more in-depth numbers. But the real question here is that if you focus just on wages, the work needs to get done. You can find different ways to do the work more cheaply, or you can take a different approach and say that maybe a lot of this work shouldn't be on the table. If you look at that, you have a whole bunch more money to look at, because then you are looking across sectors.
I'll give a quick example. My government wants to create 60,000 jobs in Saskatchewan by 2020. It's a great idea that is very ambitious and job-focused. I will put this in a corrections perspective. If you take those jobs and say that these are $50,000 jobs—which you know they won't be, but some of them will be—a $50,000 job creates roughly $4,000 of provincial income tax. What that means is that it takes 12 jobs to pay for the housing of one inmate.
With our inmate growth last year, it would take 2,340 jobs to pay for inmate growth alone. Out of those 60,000 jobs, it would take 16,380 of them just to pay for inmate growth over that same timeframe. That doesn't include policing, it doesn't include the court system, and it doesn't include the health system.
I think the answer to this is to look more comprehensively at where the big savings are. The wages are dictated by the market. That doesn't mean that you don't have controls in place, but in my opinion, there is a bigger question to be asked.