It's not exactly on this amendment, Mr. Chair, so you can cut me off if you want. I took it to mean that the government recommendation 1 dealt with this issue somewhat. I still think I'm in line with Randall here, and I hear what Rick's saying, in that I think if we're too broad we're going to run into public safety issues that are unnecessary for us to run into. The question, I guess, is to find the balance between what I think Randall's resolution, NDP-1, is trying to do, as well as what government is trying to do. We do need to find the right balance. I understand what Mr. Norlock is saying, but if we are too broad, I believe we are going to jeopardize public safety, and that's not what we want to do either.
On February 27th, 2014. See this statement in context.