The chair agrees with you but needs some direction here. Are we talking about a simple translation issue, or are we talking about different interpretations of the meaning? Mr. Garrison has raised both points, and Madame Doré raised the point about translation.
Mr. Garrison based his subamendment on interpretation of the meaning. So we're both talking on the same subamendment, but the chair has to have a sense of direction.
Mr. Garrison, could we bring this to a close?