—is there reason to read into this that it is really the chairperson who will make the decision?
The intent of this bill in the beginning was to provide more information to the victims on a number of things. But what I'm finding with all the amendments, mainly from the government, is that it's more a “may” situation than a “shall”, if I could put it like that. I know that my own amendment on that lost, but it comes down to whether or not information will be made to the victims. It basically comes down to regardless what the legislation says, it's the chairman's opinion. Is that correct?