Again, I come back to what I pointed out before. I think CSC obviously has an important role to play and the Parole Board has an important role to play.
I do see, though, that the two are operating independently of the criteria that's required to release an offender back into the community, for whatever reason.
Clearly, in my case, there are two offenders and in both the outcome has been the same. When the Parole Board has felt that this is what their recommendation is, after a thorough independent review of every bit of information they have, the CSC's opinion is very different. To me, that's where you have two schools of thought operating independently of one another, and that's where the problem lies. They both need to be on the same page.
Granted, over the years there has been a lot of work that's happened to bring those two agencies together, but I think they still have a very fundamental difference of what is required of an offender before he or she is ready to be released, in whatever capacity, back into the community.