I'm sorry, Mr. Easter.
I'd like to respond to your second question and get back to your first question. Of course I have reviewed the report of the Office of the Correctional Investigator. There has been a long-term relationship with the Correctional Service, and they take their recommendations very seriously. This being said, I think, Mr. Easter, facts speak louder than rhetoric.
As I've just indicated, you've seen that we are ready to make sure that inmates are provided with the support and the services they need. This is good for all inmates, male and female, wherever. We have a special aboriginal program, but you are also aware that we are also taking care of those who have severe mental health issues. In that case, as you know, these require many resources: experts, specialists, and we are not afraid to deal with one of the best facilities in Canada, if not in the world, such as the Royal, to make sure we are putting the inmate in an environment where they can succeed.
I believe this is a good investment because if we are able to put those individuals in a safer environment and apply this vision of Correctional Service Canada, those individuals may be able to downgrade into a level of services, and eventually I still think every one of them can return to civilian life unless advised otherwise by a judge.
We are not fearful of investing, as you can see. If we are returning money to the fiscal framework, it is because we have closed two prisons: Kingston and Montreal.
I'd be pleased to answer your first question if you want me to, but I think—