So then, there really is an aspect of cost reduction driving this kind of initiative.
A second question I have is this. If you're bringing private money into the crime prevention system, don't we have a danger...? I hesitate to say “would you agree with me”, as Mr. Norlock always does, but would you agree that we have a danger that private decisions will distort the public priorities?
For example, we visited Calgary and talked about all the wonderful programs funded by businesses in Calgary. Calgary is very lucky. It has the headquarters of the oil sands, with a lot of money and a need to buy goodwill with a lot of that money. But if you go to other communities in Alberta or British Columbia that don't have those corporate headquarters and don't have those companies that need to buy goodwill, you don't have those resources.
When the government ends up funding or advancing funds to those private interests to make these initiatives work, it really drives money to where the money already is instead of sometimes to the communities that have the greatest need.