That's a very interesting point. It depends on the nature of the crime you're trying to prevent, I think.
One of the things that I think is key to one of the questions that was asked earlier is you're bringing together the community to help solve the problem. This is not something the government has to create the answer for. The culture shift that I think needs to occur is to say the actors in our society are figuring out the ways to create the interventions that make the most sense, that matter to that community.
The government is not the funder of those things. It's not the one that runs the programming. You're simply the actor that is helping to catalyze, to support. That could be through policy change. It doesn't have to be through any capital intervention.
The best answer I can give for that piece is to say the first thing I would do is I would talk to rural Quebec and see what kind of interventions their community is already trying to create. Are they undersupported? Are they reliant on small, local, charitable foundations? Is that not enough support? Is there a way you can enhance that investment?