Is the fact that we're into social financing for social housing a problem because we're not emphasizing our housing strategy enough as a country from a government level?
We've seen some cutbacks in that area this year. My concern is that when you look at the country as a whole, you're in London and there may be ample opportunities for social finance in London, Ontario, but I can tell you that in Kensington, P.E.I., there aren't a heck of a lot of social finance opportunities. If this gives the governments the opportunity to say, “Okay, this has been looked after by communities, so now we don't have to be involved in social housing anymore”, you will have a patchwork quilt of programming across the country. You'll have cities where there are some wealthy people with the ability to provide funding, and there will be other areas where you won't.
Is that a danger?