Actually, that kind of speaks to my next question to some degree, I think, because I think that's actually one of the criticisms there are of the current model of crime prevention programs. There's a lack of really having any kind of hard metrics to measure the results. Would you see, though, the idea of a social impact bond having a better way to have more definitive results that we could actually measure? I would think that would have to be part of the social impact bond type of model. Obviously, in order to pay for successful outcomes, there must be a way that you can actually measure that there are outcomes that are meeting the results you're seeking. I know you've sort of identified that just briefly in your previous response, but would you see that as being one of the positives here?
On May 29th, 2014. See this statement in context.