Absolutely. I think ultimately all of the various stakeholders in not only a social impact bond but in the general social finance landscape, whether that is public, private, or social sector, have similar objectives around wanting to see our communities healthier, better, and more crime-free, in this particular case. Obviously, with the diversity of beneficiaries from the programs implemented within the realm of crime prevention, there will be all kinds of different needs that each beneficiary of these programs will need to receive from implementing organizations.
I think one of the great things about this type of model is that you identify a specific outcome, whether that is the reduction of recidivism or perhaps, in this case, an avoidance of juvenile justice system interaction. Then the financing that goes towards the meeting of that outcome is unrestricted. It doesn't matter how it's used within the course or the implementation of the program as long as that specific outcome is met.
I think it allows for a lot of flexibility and diversity and innovation and creativity when it comes to looking at what types of programs we are funding.