In the example I was just talking about, with the aboriginals, what the organization is saying, of course, is that they have worse outcomes because they deal with a more highly challenged population, with a history of residential schools and alcohol and drug abuse. They say they've been compared with all the other people who are operating and who are dealing with much less high-risk and much less difficult populations. That comes back to the concern, which you did address, about taking the low-hanging fruit or cherry-picking the easiest-served parts of the population so that you can more easily reduce your risk and increase success.
On May 29th, 2014. See this statement in context.