I think I'll stick to what I said earlier, that of course I'm supportive of any venture that would reduce harm to Canadians. But if it's a stand-alone venture apart from a larger strategic framework, I don't think the word “sustainability” should be attached to it. But I think that if something can be shown to work, we need to support that. I'm not sure in this case that the recent literature, at least what has been provided to this committee, states that it does in fact have the impact or outcome they want.
On June 3rd, 2014. See this statement in context.