In terms of the statutory legislation that creates some sense of responsibility, obligation, and transparency, I think it's crucial. I think of all things that moved the United Kingdom, or Britain, if you will, out of their repetitive or stalled crime prevention setting was the Crime and Disorder Act.
There are three specific sections of the Crime and Disorder Act to me that are transformative to the effort.
The first one is section 17,which requires all local area authorities to maintain community safety issues in all areas of their policy—but not to the neglect of their other responsibilities.
Section 5 places a duty on those local area authorities, along with police, health, and other probation committees, to work together to tackle the problems of crime, to put aside jurisdictional issues or maybe silos and other things, and to force them in some ways, according to the law, to work together.
In section 6, partnerships are mandated to produce and publish strategies for these problems. These have to be based on an audit of crime that is done regularly within their community.
To me, the statutory authority is really everything. It also assumes that there would be a financial contribution of substantial degree toward that effort.