One of the witnesses at committee described the grant and contribution process as essentially 100% loss with the hope of an outcome. So I wonder if you could compare that to a social impact bond model where there is sustainable investment and an expectation of an outcome from a societal perspective. From the taxpayers' perspective, would you not agree that it's best to expect tax dollars to create outcomes and actually prevent crime?
On June 3rd, 2014. See this statement in context.