In the reference you made to the Horner report, which is a House of Commons committee report from 1993 for those who hadn't figured that out, it talks about a much higher level of spending, and we have that contrasted with the current bureaucracy saying that we can't afford to do that kind of spending. I guess my impression from that Horner report was that it's an investment rather than spending, that if the government put more money into crime prevention, it would actually save money in the long run. Is that the tenor of the Horner report?
On June 3rd, 2014. See this statement in context.