Okay. If we bring in a program that says we want to reduce.... I need to hone this down to where people at home can understand it and not get into esoterics. Let's say that we have a problem in a village or a town, where there is a lot of vandalism. A group in the community, let's call it the United Way, says, “We would like to work with”—and people think it's youth and there's evidence to indicate that it is—“our young people in our community to prevent this vandalism and we're going to bring in programs, but we need some funding for them.”
Then, someone in the community, let's say the local Tim Hortons owner, says, “I'd like to contribute to this, so here is the money for you to develop the program.” A year or a year and a half later, whatever the time span, their social contract shows, and everyone in the village sees, that the instances of vandalism have gone down to the measurable result that the contract agreed to. You're saying that really isn't a good measure.