I appreciate your point, and I think there clearly are areas where government must remain involved. I do think high-risk offenders would be one area and mental health would be another, particularly when you're dealing with offenders. It isn't to say that we can't find different kinds of arrangements to work with our community partners, but clearly those are areas where government needs to remain involved.
As I said at our last meeting, we are not seeing any removal of funding or any change in our programming that suggests the government is removing itself from those program areas.
I think there are other areas, where we're dealing with less-risky offenders whose integration back into the community could easily be highlighted by a strong community partnership, where the communities are making a significant investment and where we're more or less doing monitoring and oversight.