The only thing I would say is that if what you're saying is true, the implications are that you really don't have to improve your programs. If you're saying that there really isn't an opportunity for marginal impacts, then the status quo is acceptable to you. I don't think you want to say that.
To me, it seems as if it's always in comparison to where you are, but I don't think you would say you don't think you can do any better, that you can't run better programs, you can't have better results. Canada is a great country, but is it utopia?