In some models being tested—and I'm thinking particularly of the Roca model, which is the one being used to work with the young men in Massachusetts—the model really is explicitly designed to meet the individuals where they are and to figure out which services they need. Some individuals need educational services before they're ready to get job training services. Other people are ready to go directly into a job. I think a number of the service providers involved in these projects are very good at figuring out which services go to which individuals.
I would say in some cases these projects themselves, because they tend to work though the government referring a fixed population to the service providers rather than having the service providers going out and doing the recruiting themselves, the individuals are causing the service providers to have to get better at figuring out how their existing model is the right solution and how they have to add to their existing model to be able to serve the whole population that they've been assigned.
We're seeing a lot of the kind of flexibility you're talking about, but I think this model is actually causing more of that to be created in the service providers, because they're on the hook for the outcomes, so they have to figure out innovative solutions that will get better outcomes.