Coming back to the three points, I was impressed with these three points. If they could work and improve government decision-making, in my opinion we could use a little of that around here, Mr. Chair. Helping government shift revenues from remediation to prevention is a good idea, as is enabling government to enter into collaborative agreements with other sources. Those objectives are absolutely great.
In terms of wherever you're at with the programs that are in place thus far, I don't think you're in a position yet to tell us how successful they have or have not been, but once the program is originally designed and the funding structure set up, for the measures you're taking, do you adapt to those as you go along? Is it ever-changing or do you start a program and you're firm in that program? Does it adapt as you go along in terms of seeing some problems and some changes that should be made? Ideas...?