I think you outlined the potential opportunities that might be available.
Some negative consequences that may come from that...and I'm not sure they're negative. I think they may lead to improved capacity and professionalism amongst the non-profits.
I talked about this earlier. We need an oversight body, which I believe is government, to make sure the entire social safety net is still adequately being supported and that certain organizations.... If we were wildly successful and were to receive this, I would hate to see us continue to get funding at the expense of other areas that are just as critical. The key issue with this stuff is that we have to float all boats in order to be successful, and someone needs to have that oversight piece.
It is true that people put their money in what they value. But if they're unaware of other areas—and I think about the breast cancer example that I used—then those areas need to be managed and looked after by government. If we don't, then we will have gaps and a patchy social safety net, as I think another member has talked about, and that will be a problem.