That's good to hear.
So basically the federal government brings in a program in the province of Alberta. You prove that investment is a good investment. The federal government tells you to go and look for more sources. The Government of Alberta sees it's a pretty good investment, so takes it over
What's to prevent someone else coming in and saying, “Government of Alberta, you can divert the money you're spending with these folks, because we'll take it over, but what we want to see is...”. You said that for every dollar invested, $6.31, in other words $16 million value added back to the Government of Alberta. What would be wrong with an entity that funded you, to the tune of x number of dollars—whatever it costs you to run your program—receiving a profit or a bonus for investing in you, and the contract saying that if you don't get these results, you're not going to get any money back. The government doesn't lose out on any money. You don't lose out on any money, because your program is still on the go. Who loses out basically is the investor.
Tell me some bad things about this, because that's what this committee wants to hear. Not only do we want to hear the good things, but also we want to hear any of the cautions that may come out.