I think what you just said, that the dollars actually produce something, is very important to note. I think when you get into social financing and you're bringing in private investors, they're going to have a real vested interest in making sure the dollars are bringing in a return on investment, public good, and so on. Up until now, with many governments, it's almost as though a grant has been given to an organization, but the period of time for the project to take place elapses and there's really no evaluation done to determine what the return on investment is at that point. With social financing, you have the ability to do that.
You mentioned Finance for Good. We've also heard from this organization. I'm not sure if you're aware of that. They play an intermediary role in this whole scheme. I'm just wondering what you see the role of the intermediary as being and how they actually play into this from your perspective.