Yes. I think you're coming to some points that.... There's no question that there seems to be considerable favour and considerable push, actually, on the government side, for the social impact bonds. I think some of the rest of us are looking at how you make that work in a fair and balanced way across the country.
In some areas where there isn't as much investment, how do you prevent national crime prevention policies from being reduced? We hear they're not going to be, but I've heard that before. We have a government that really is not all that interested in national strategies, and this is a push by the federal government. What are the As, Bs, and Cs that we need to pinpoint—and these questions are a good start—that need to be put in place to ensure the national government is providing the leadership on all those other areas beyond just the social impact bond?
Do either of you have any suggestions?