Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
I want to get back to the question that my colleague Mr. Scott asked earlier and that went unanswered. It is important if we want to properly understand the legislation and the potential effects of the measures, for example of revoking the passport of a citizen involved in terrorist activities.
I will give a more concrete example to illustrate the question that was asked earlier.
Take a young man who is 17 or 18 years old and who unfortunately takes up with the wrong crowd. He becomes radicalized and makes the bad decision to go abroad, so his passport is revoked. I am not questioning the idea of revoking a passport. I understand the logic behind that. This young man goes abroad and participates in terrorist activities without being an active fighter. After a few days, a few weeks or a few months, he realizes that he has made the worst mistake of his life and questions his new radical beliefs. He would like to be able to return home and get back to his normal life.
Is there a way for him to make amends and return to the country? Is there something he can do, or does this mean that once he made the decision to go abroad, regardless of the circumstances or what happens in the future, this is definitive and he will be stuck in the country he decided to go to?