I understand what you're saying, but I wasn't questioning the idea of revoking a citizen's passport. I was trying to understand the impact of that decision. I don't know whether someone other than the minister could clarify this for me, because all I'm getting is a partisan answer that doesn't respond to my question.
If I understand correctly, once a passport has been revoked, this person will forever be considered a threat and will be confined to the country he or she had gone to. There would be no way to go back, even if there was concrete proof that this individual had reformed. I am not asking this for no reason.
I just want to clarify. Is my understanding correct?