Okay.
I notice that throughout the bill, in terms of the criteria, the word “opinion” appears a lot. For example, “the opinion of the provincial minister of health”, “the opinion of the chief of police”, etc. I'm just wondering why the opinion would matter as opposed to evidence in terms of factual information. Why was that word chosen? It seems to me that it allows an enormous amount of discretion from the person or organization that's providing an opinion. An opinion based on what: their own feeling, how they think about this stuff, as opposed to evidence that's based on health principles or other studies or reports that might have been done?