One of things that really concerns me about the bill is that it seems that the whole bill is tipped in the exact opposite direction to relevance. It's actually not about relevance or evidence. It seems to be more about opinion and discretion. Even if you heroically meet all of the criteria am I correct in saying that for the minister, even when she considers her principles laid out in the act, there's nothing to say that the application should be approved?
Is that correct?