Chair, I just wish to respond to the statement that was made that this was all inaccurate. We know the one person who made this charge. This was a clinical trial project and it was reviewed not only by the people who conducted the project and the trial. It was reviewed by 24 international peer review bodies. It was named in Nature , the major science magazine, and it labelled all of the peer review from many countries in the world. They all came down with the same agreement. That evidence is one of the reasons we have 70 sites in Europe and in Sydney, Australia.
On November 5th, 2014. See this statement in context.