We will not be supporting it. We've stated reasons similar to this on another amendment put forward. The bill is designed to create two separate exemption regimes, one for licit substances and one for illicit substances. Exemption applications would still be considered for activities falling under three categories with regard to licit substances: medical, scientific, and public interest. The public interest is well served through this regime. For activities involving illicit substances, the categories under which an application would be considered would be medical, law enforcement, and prescribed purpose. These categories have been chosen given the risks associated with the use of these types of substances, so we will not be supporting this amendment.
On November 5th, 2014. See this statement in context.