It is true that the service is not an enforcement agency. We're not in the business of collecting evidence. But again, because of the evolution of threats, we're more and more indirectly—and sometimes directly—involved not in criminal investigations because we run parallel investigations with the RCMP, but just because of the nature of the relationship and exchange of information. At times service information will be used in criminal proceedings, or could be used regarding security certificates, for example. Although we're not in the business of collecting evidence, that's why our intelligence will either be challenged or there will be a request for more disclosure, including the identity of human sources.
It's just that the nature of the threat environment has changed and has changed the service interaction in dealing with those different proceedings.