I guess I would just confine myself to the solutions to some of the omissions that I addressed to my presentation. That is, there is some clarifying language that might accommodate some of these concerns that I've raised, which you're pointing to. Again, indicating when the trigger point is for seeking these warrants, and then also engaging the Federal Court judge in supervision of overseas conduct that might be problematic....
And at the end of the day, I'll just harken back to the Arar report that said that there are instances where we really can't engage in this conduct. In the context of information sharing, there are circumstances where we simply can't share the information, and where the human rights implications are so dire. There are legal fixes and then there's also good judgement.