We discussed the fact that there is a ministerial direction on information sharing with foreign entities. It was issued to CSIS in, I believe, July 2011. That set out an approach about information sharing where there may be a risk of mistreatment, because it certainly is a concern.
We believe, Rick and I—I don't know about everybody else—that this ministerial direction covers the intent of this amendment, and we think it's the best way to handle it.
You can nod if I'm correct.
The authority is actually broader in this case, because if you subject it to international law rather than to the information sharing ministerial direction, you limit the scope of our operations by what might be written outside of Canada. This is basically a made-in-Canada protocol. We think it's adequate and the one that should be followed.
Is there anything you want to croak...to add?
There are no croaks from Mr. Norlock, so I think I have stated his concerns adequately.