I fully support this amendment.
I've always maintained that it was a mistake to do away with the office of inspector general. Actually, having been there myself, it was a great protection, even for the minister.
We are the only one of the Five Eyes—New Zealand, Australia, the U.K., and the United States—that does not have parliamentary oversight.
This would at least provide a sensible review in two years, basically a forced review, if I can put it that way, of our current oversight agencies to ensure there's a balance between national security and civil liberties, and that the current oversight agencies are, in fact, adequate to do the job. I don't believe they are, but this, at least, would incorporate it into an act, where there is at least some kind of parliamentary review that would come up within a couple of years' time, which I think would be helpful for public policy.