I understand what Diane is saying, Mr. Chair, and I understand it from a national security point of view, but on the other side of the coin, if an individual is informing on someone else, that person needs to be able to question that individual in court, and that is the dilemma. They need to be able to defend themselves. That is why the amendment is there. But I do understand where you are coming from as well.
On December 1st, 2014. See this statement in context.