It's good to see those best practices working, but the prison population is, if I can use a pun, a captive audience for these kinds of interventions. When Commissioner Head appeared, he gave us quite an overview of the suite of programs available in prison. I'll go through them quickly.
He said there was about $9 million spent on substance abuse programs. We spend about $10 million on violence prevention programs, over $2 million on family violence programming, $4.5 million on sex offender programming, $7 million on maintenance programming, $60 million on social programs, $14 million on integrated correctional program models, about $25 million on education, and then $42 million on core employment skills and employability activities. There's a broad and holistic suite of programs available.
The intent of this bill is to incentivize an offender who has an addiction problem not to continue addictive behaviour in prison, even though Mr. Grabowsky's colleagues are doing their best to take away that possibility.
I'm interested, Mr. Grabowsky, because of your experience with offenders. Do you see yourself saying to an offender that if they continue to use drugs, even though you're trying to keep them out of their hands, it is going to impact their bid for freedom at the end of their sentence? Do you see that as an incentive for offenders or for a large number...?