It's not so much that we see this as a bill that is right or wrong. I mean I know it was said, “Oh, it's something new and we don't know”, but how it's written we don't see how to operationalize it to make it a useful thing. Certainly, somebody who has a condition for release and they want to breach that condition, they should be held accountable for it, but how is that going to operationalize with the wording that's here? That for us, for correctional officers, is one of our great concerns. I mean if you look even inside the prison, an inmate who has a dirty urinalysis or refuses, for years we have been saying why do we reward that behaviour with a private family visit? That may be how the drugs are coming in, through that private family visit, and we can't stop those kinds of things.
In terms of some of the tools that are needed inside the prison, certainly programming is a big one. Locking an inmate in a cell for 24 hours a day and throwing away the key may be something that sounds good, but as a person who has worked with inmates for as many years as I have, somebody has to open that door. It's what's on the other side of that door sometimes that you don't want to deal with.