In response to the first question, I thought Ms. Latimer put it very well in her statement that the legislation is consistent with current parole authorities. So insomuch as an increased risk to public safety, I agree, I don't think it does.
In terms of what we can do in order to better promote recovery from addiction through legislation, parole officers also already have the tools to direct parolees to community services, and to promote their access to those services. How to better enshrine that in legislation I would leave to my colleagues at the Department of Justice. I'm afraid I don't have expertise in writing legislation. If there could be some recognition of the disease of addiction as a health issue requiring treatment, really shifting the language to recognize that status would be, I think, helpful on many levels.