Yes. We have a standing task force that we created with other agencies—CSIS, CBSA, the military occasionally, CIC, and passport people—to do that very thing, because I think we recognize that in this case, an aggravating or triggering element to his experience was his frustration over the passport business. When we get in front of a high-risk traveller and say that a passport will be removed, the decision to do that has been made in this joint operation centre with a view to the propriety and legality of taking the steps we want to take, but also to the impact that doing so may have on other investigations and processes. It's what we refer to as a deconfliction mechanism to say if we are going to take somebody's passport away from them, we need to assess that individual and his possible reaction to that act, and we need to be positioned to intercept any sort of adverse action. It's an elaborate and sophisticated assessment system.