I framed it as being the result of sound operational decisions or reasons.
Part of the challenge in this case and in others is to ensure that the integrity of the investigative process is preserved. That's not because we want to be secretive, but because at the end of the day, there's a whole big accountability hammer that comes down on us as to how we've conducted ourselves, how we've investigated, how we've behaved, and how we can demonstrate the purity of the evidence we are putting forward.
Believe me, we have worked through the reasoning. As I said, I was originally committed to having the whole video released, but the operational decision-makers began to engage me, as I do them, with regard to the reasons I would want to do this or not want to do this, not unlike the situation with other cases. The rationale is there. Hopefully it will be available for review.