I want as well to thank Professors Roach and Forcese for all the writing they have done on this subject, because I think it has opened up questions and has made people think. We can hardly keep up with reading it, let alone writing it; you have done a phenomenal amount of work.
There are two points that you have both raised.
Professor Roach, you said, “If everything is a security matter, [then]...nothing is.” Mr. Forcese said that this approach to everything, “risks...undermining our security”.
I take it you believe that from a national security aspect the bill is important but that it goes too far in many areas and therefore risks actually complicating security in some ways.
Can you expand on that a little further?