Thank you for your question. My response is that the way this law is drafted, it's imprecise and it's overbroad. What this means is that we do not dispute the objective of the law, but the impact will be beyond what the law is meant to target. That is the problem.
Just for the record, we do not dispute that there is a terrorist threat. What we question is why this bill is necessary, and we are very concerned about the overbroad impact. There is not a rational connection to some of the impacts that will result as a result of the drafting.
The last thing is that we cannot just hope that it won't be applied in a way that it could reasonably be applied reading the provisions as drafted.